Avoid N+1 query for channels with new messages
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla@zed.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9d997b218
commit
0db4b29452
5 changed files with 88 additions and 69 deletions
|
@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ test_both_dbs!(
|
|||
);
|
||||
|
||||
async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
||||
panic!("Rewriting the way this works");
|
||||
|
||||
let user_a = db
|
||||
.create_user(
|
||||
"user_a@example.com",
|
||||
|
@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
let owner_id = db.create_server("test").await.unwrap().0 as u32;
|
||||
|
||||
// Zero case: no messages at all
|
||||
assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
let a_connection_id = rpc::ConnectionId { owner_id, id: 0 };
|
||||
db.join_channel_chat(channel, a_connection_id, user_a)
|
||||
|
@ -131,7 +133,7 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Smoke test: can we detect a new message?
|
||||
assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
let b_connection_id = rpc::ConnectionId { owner_id, id: 1 };
|
||||
db.join_channel_chat(channel, b_connection_id, user_b)
|
||||
|
@ -139,7 +141,7 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Joining the channel should _not_ update us to the latest message
|
||||
assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// Reading the earlier messages should not change that we have new messages
|
||||
let _ = db
|
||||
|
@ -147,7 +149,7 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// This constraint is currently inexpressible, creating a message implicitly broadcasts
|
||||
// it to all participants
|
||||
|
@ -165,7 +167,7 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// And future messages should not reset the flag
|
||||
let _ = db
|
||||
|
@ -173,26 +175,26 @@ async fn test_channel_message_new_notification(db: &Arc<Database>) {
|
|||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
let _ = db
|
||||
.create_channel_message(channel, user_b, "6", OffsetDateTime::now_utc(), 6)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// And we should start seeing the flag again after we've left the channel
|
||||
db.leave_channel_chat(channel, b_connection_id, user_b)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(!db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
let _ = db
|
||||
.create_channel_message(channel, user_a, "7", OffsetDateTime::now_utc(), 7)
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
// assert!(db.has_new_message_tx(channel, user_b).await.unwrap());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue