Use anyhow more idiomatically (#31052)

https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/30972 brought up another
case where our context is not enough to track the actual source of the
issue: we get a general top-level error without inner error.

The reason for this was `.ok_or_else(|| anyhow!("failed to read HEAD
SHA"))?; ` on the top level.

The PR finally reworks the way we use anyhow to reduce such issues (or
at least make it simpler to bubble them up later in a fix).
On top of that, uses a few more anyhow methods for better readability.

* `.ok_or_else(|| anyhow!("..."))`, `map_err` and other similar error
conversion/option reporting cases are replaced with `context` and
`with_context` calls
* in addition to that, various `anyhow!("failed to do ...")` are
stripped with `.context("Doing ...")` messages instead to remove the
parasitic `failed to` text
* `anyhow::ensure!` is used instead of `if ... { return Err(...); }`
calls
* `anyhow::bail!` is used instead of `return Err(anyhow!(...));`

Release Notes:

- N/A
This commit is contained in:
Kirill Bulatov 2025-05-21 02:06:07 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 1e51a7ac44
commit 16366cf9f2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
294 changed files with 2037 additions and 2610 deletions

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ use std::{
ptr,
};
use anyhow::{Result, anyhow};
use anyhow::Result;
use libsqlite3_sys::*;
pub struct Connection {
@ -199,11 +199,7 @@ impl Connection {
)
};
Err(anyhow!(
"Sqlite call failed with code {} and message: {:?}",
code as isize,
message
))
anyhow::bail!("Sqlite call failed with code {code} and message: {message:?}")
}
}