Rewrote and documented was_top_layer
logic
Co-Authored-By: Antonio Scandurra <antonio@zed.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
455d5eeb89
commit
3b3252b040
1 changed files with 30 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -800,26 +800,39 @@ impl<'a> WindowContext<'a> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns true if there is no opaque layer containing the given point
|
||||
/// on top of the given level. Layers whose level is an extension of the
|
||||
/// level are not considered to be on top of the level.
|
||||
pub fn was_top_layer(&self, point: &Point<Pixels>, level: &StackingOrder) -> bool {
|
||||
for (opaque_level, _, bounds) in self.window.rendered_frame.depth_map.iter() {
|
||||
if level >= opaque_level {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/// on top of the given level. Layers who are extensions of the queried layer
|
||||
/// are not considered to be on top of queried layer.
|
||||
pub fn was_top_layer(&self, point: &Point<Pixels>, layer: &StackingOrder) -> bool {
|
||||
// Precondition: the depth map is ordered from topmost to bottomost.
|
||||
|
||||
for (opaque_layer, _, bounds) in self.window.rendered_frame.depth_map.iter() {
|
||||
if layer >= opaque_layer {
|
||||
// The queried layer is either above or is the same as the this opaque layer.
|
||||
// Anything after this point is guaranteed to be below the queried layer.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if bounds.contains(point) {
|
||||
let starts_with = opaque_level
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.zip(level.iter())
|
||||
.all(|(a, b)| a.z_index == b.z_index)
|
||||
&& opaque_level.len() >= level.len();
|
||||
if !bounds.contains(point) {
|
||||
// This opaque layer is above the queried layer but it doesn't contain
|
||||
// the given position, so we can ignore it even if it's above.
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !starts_with {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// At this point, we've established that this opaque layer is on top of the queried layer
|
||||
// and contains the position:
|
||||
// - If the opaque layer is an extension of the queried layer, we don't want
|
||||
// to consider the opaque layer to be on top and so we ignore it.
|
||||
// - Else, we will bail early and say that the queried layer wasn't the top one.
|
||||
let opaque_layer_is_extension_of_queried_layer = opaque_layer.len() >= layer.len()
|
||||
&& opaque_layer
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.zip(layer.iter())
|
||||
.all(|(a, b)| a.z_index == b.z_index);
|
||||
if !opaque_layer_is_extension_of_queried_layer {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -832,6 +845,7 @@ impl<'a> WindowContext<'a> {
|
|||
if level >= opaque_level {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if opaque_level
|
||||
.first()
|
||||
.map(|c| c.z_index == ACTIVE_DRAG_Z_INDEX)
|
||||
|
@ -840,7 +854,7 @@ impl<'a> WindowContext<'a> {
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if bounds.contains(point) && !opaque_level.starts_with(level) {
|
||||
if bounds.contains(point) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue