Add removing of previous channel channel, allowing for channel moving operations

This commit is contained in:
Mikayla 2023-09-07 15:16:17 -07:00
parent fc78db39ef
commit bd9e964a69
No known key found for this signature in database
2 changed files with 129 additions and 92 deletions

View file

@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ impl Database {
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
dbg!(channel_path::Entity::find().all(&*tx).await?);
} else {
channel_path::Entity::insert(channel_path::ActiveModel {
channel_id: ActiveValue::Set(channel.id),
@ -338,7 +337,6 @@ impl Database {
.get_channel_descendants(channel_memberships.iter().map(|m| m.channel_id), &*tx)
.await?;
dbg!(&parents_by_child_id);
let channels_with_admin_privileges = channel_memberships
.iter()
@ -601,6 +599,20 @@ impl Database {
Ok(channel_ids)
}
/// Returns the channel descendants,
/// Structured as a map from child ids to their parent ids
/// For example, the descendants of 'a' in this DAG:
///
/// /- b -\
/// a -- c -- d
///
/// would be:
/// {
/// a: [],
/// b: [a],
/// c: [a],
/// d: [a, c],
/// }
async fn get_channel_descendants(
&self,
channel_ids: impl IntoIterator<Item = ChannelId>,
@ -726,28 +738,23 @@ impl Database {
.await
}
async fn link_channel(&self, user: UserId, from: ChannelId, to: ChannelId) -> Result<()> {
self.transaction(|tx| async move {
self.check_user_is_channel_admin(to, user, &*tx).await?;
// TODO: Downgrade this check once our permissions system isn't busted
// You should be able to safely link a member channel for your own uses. See:
// https://zed.dev/blog/this-week-at-zed-15 > Mikayla's section
//
// Note that even with these higher permissions, this linking operation
// is still insecure because you can't remove someone's permissions to a
// channel if they've linked the channel to one where they're an admin.
self.check_user_is_channel_admin(from, user, &*tx).await?;
let to_ancestors = self.get_channel_ancestors(to, &*tx).await?;
let from_descendants = self.get_channel_descendants([from], &*tx).await?;
for ancestor in to_ancestors {
if from_descendants.contains_key(&ancestor) {
return Err(anyhow!("Cannot create a channel cycle").into());
}
async fn link_channel(
&self,
from: ChannelId,
to: ChannelId,
tx: &DatabaseTransaction,
) -> Result<()> {
let to_ancestors = self.get_channel_ancestors(to, &*tx).await?;
let from_descendants = self.get_channel_descendants([from], &*tx).await?;
for ancestor in to_ancestors {
if from_descendants.contains_key(&ancestor) {
return Err(anyhow!("Cannot create a channel cycle").into());
}
}
let sql = r#"
let sql = r#"
INSERT INTO channel_paths
(id_path, channel_id)
SELECT
@ -758,39 +765,61 @@ impl Database {
channel_id = $3
ON CONFLICT (id_path) DO NOTHING;
"#;
let channel_paths_stmt = Statement::from_sql_and_values(
self.pool.get_database_backend(),
sql,
[
from.to_proto().into(),
from.to_proto().into(),
to.to_proto().into(),
],
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
let channel_paths_stmt = Statement::from_sql_and_values(
self.pool.get_database_backend(),
sql,
[
from.to_proto().into(),
from.to_proto().into(),
to.to_proto().into(),
],
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
for (from_id, to_ids) in from_descendants.iter().filter(|(id, _)| id == &&from) {
for to_id in to_ids {
let channel_paths_stmt = Statement::from_sql_and_values(
self.pool.get_database_backend(),
sql,
[
from_id.to_proto().into(),
from_id.to_proto().into(),
to_id.to_proto().into(),
],
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
}
for (from_id, to_ids) in from_descendants.iter().filter(|(id, _)| id != &&from) {
for to_id in to_ids {
let channel_paths_stmt = Statement::from_sql_and_values(
self.pool.get_database_backend(),
sql,
[
from_id.to_proto().into(),
from_id.to_proto().into(),
to_id.to_proto().into(),
],
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
}
}
Ok(())
})
.await
Ok(())
}
async fn remove_channel_from_parent(&self, user: UserId, from: ChannelId, parent: ChannelId) -> Result<()> {
todo!()
async fn remove_channel_from_parent(
&self,
from: ChannelId,
parent: ChannelId,
tx: &DatabaseTransaction,
) -> Result<()> {
let sql = r#"
DELETE FROM channel_paths
WHERE
id_path LIKE '%' || $1 || '/' || $2 || '%'
"#;
let channel_paths_stmt = Statement::from_sql_and_values(
self.pool.get_database_backend(),
sql,
[
parent.to_proto().into(),
from.to_proto().into(),
],
);
tx.execute(channel_paths_stmt).await?;
Ok(())
}
/// Move a channel from one parent to another.
@ -798,7 +827,7 @@ impl Database {
/// As channels are a DAG, we need to know which parent to remove the channel from.
/// Here's a list of the parameters to this function and their behavior:
///
/// - (`None`, `None`) Noop
/// - (`None`, `None`) No op
/// - (`None`, `Some(id)`) Link the channel without removing it from any of it's parents
/// - (`Some(id)`, `None`) Remove a channel from a given parent, and leave other parents
/// - (`Some(id)`, `Some(id)`) Move channel from one parent to another, leaving other parents
@ -809,13 +838,30 @@ impl Database {
from_parent: Option<ChannelId>,
to: Option<ChannelId>,
) -> Result<()> {
if let Some(to) = to {
self.link_channel(user, from, to).await?;
}
if let Some(from_parent) = from_parent {
self.remove_channel_from_parent(user, from, from_parent).await?;
}
Ok(())
self.transaction(|tx| async move {
// Note that even with these maxed permissions, this linking operation
// is still insecure because you can't remove someone's permissions to a
// channel if they've linked the channel to one where they're an admin.
self.check_user_is_channel_admin(from, user, &*tx).await?;
if let Some(to) = to {
self.check_user_is_channel_admin(to, user, &*tx).await?;
self.link_channel(from, to, &*tx).await?;
}
// The removal must come after the linking so that we don't leave
// sub channels stranded
if let Some(from_parent) = from_parent {
self.check_user_is_channel_admin(from_parent, user, &*tx)
.await?;
self.remove_channel_from_parent(from, from_parent, &*tx)
.await?;
}
Ok(())
})
.await
}
}