Follow-up fixes for recent multi buffer optimizations (#26345)

I realized that the optimization broke multi buffer syncing after buffer
reparses.

Release Notes:

- N/A
This commit is contained in:
Max Brunsfeld 2025-03-09 22:15:38 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8a7a78fafb
commit fff37ab823
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ impl Buffer {
}
fn did_finish_parsing(&mut self, syntax_snapshot: SyntaxSnapshot, cx: &mut Context<Self>) {
self.was_changed();
self.non_text_state_update_count += 1;
self.syntax_map.lock().did_parse(syntax_snapshot);
self.request_autoindent(cx);
@ -1968,7 +1969,12 @@ impl Buffer {
/// This allows downstream code to check if the buffer's text has changed without
/// waiting for an effect cycle, which would be required if using eents.
pub fn record_changes(&mut self, bit: rc::Weak<Cell<bool>>) {
self.change_bits.push(bit);
if let Err(ix) = self
.change_bits
.binary_search_by_key(&rc::Weak::as_ptr(&bit), rc::Weak::as_ptr)
{
self.change_bits.insert(ix, bit);
}
}
fn was_changed(&mut self) {
@ -2273,12 +2279,13 @@ impl Buffer {
}
fn did_edit(&mut self, old_version: &clock::Global, was_dirty: bool, cx: &mut Context<Self>) {
self.was_changed();
if self.edits_since::<usize>(old_version).next().is_none() {
return;
}
self.reparse(cx);
cx.emit(BufferEvent::Edited);
if was_dirty != self.is_dirty() {
cx.emit(BufferEvent::DirtyChanged);
@ -2390,7 +2397,6 @@ impl Buffer {
}
self.text.apply_ops(buffer_ops);
self.deferred_ops.insert(deferred_ops);
self.was_changed();
self.flush_deferred_ops(cx);
self.did_edit(&old_version, was_dirty, cx);
// Notify independently of whether the buffer was edited as the operations could include a