* Part of https://github.com/zed-industries/community/issues/70
Allows to fully remove from Zed certain files or file groups: no items
will be scanned or added into worktrees, so nothing will be shown in
project tree, project search and go to file would not see those,
corresponding FS events will be ignored.
One exclusion is .git files: those are still not shown or accessible by
default, yet tracked in the worktrees.
By default, is configured to
```json
"file_scan_exclusions": [
"**/.git",
"**/.svn",
"**/.hg",
"**/CVS",
"**/.DS_Store",
"**/Thumbs.db",
"**/.classpath",
"**/.settings"
],
```
* In addition, contains code preparations for "search in included files"
feature: new SearchOptions variant, search crate and RPC adjustments
Release Notes:
- Added `file_scan_exclusions` section to project settings to completely
ignore certain files in Zed
Made the trait into a blanket-trait impl if you have it's two
constituent pieces (FocusableView and EventEmitter) to remove the
duplicated method. I also changed the struct to an enum for aesthetic
reasons (EventType::EventName feels self documenting to me) and added
some new `cx` APIs utilizing our new powers of dismissal.
Release Notes:
- N/A
ShapedLines are never wrapped, whereas WrappedLines are optionally
wrapped if they are associated with a wrap width. Originally, when
rewriting GPUI, I tried to combine everything because wrapping is
inherently optional for the Text element, but we have a bunch of APIs
that don't make sense on a line that may wrap, so we need a distinct
type for that case.
This is a precursor to implementing clickable links in markdown. I
noticed multiple places where we were confused about whether or not the
line was wrapped so this felt important.
Release Notes:
- N/A
ShapedLines are never wrapped, whereas WrappedLines are optionally wrapped if
they are associated with a wrap width. I tried to combine everything because
wrapping is inherently optional for the Text element, but we have a bunch of
APIs that don't make sense on a line that may wrap, so we need a distinct type
for that case.
