For #4965
There are still some minor issues:
1. When change the surround and delete the surround, we should also
decide whether there are spaces inside after deleting/replacing
according to whether it is open parentheses, and replace them
accordingly, but at present, delete and change, haven't done this
adaptation for current pr, I'm not sure if I can fit it in the back or
if it needs to be fitted together.
2. In the selection mode, pressing s plus brackets should also trigger
the Add Surrounds function, but this MR has not adapted the selection
mode for the time being, I think we need to support different add
behaviors for the three selection modes.(Currently in select mode, s is
used for Substitute)
3. For the current change surrounds, if the user does not find the
bracket that needs to be matched after entering cs, but it is a valid
bracket, and will wait for the second input before failing, the better
practice here should be to return to normal mode if the first bracket is
not found
4. I reused BracketPair in language, but two of its properties weren't
used in this mr, so I'm not sure if I should create a new struct with
only start and end, which would have less code
I'm not sure which ones need to be changed in the first issue, and which
ones can be revised in the future, and it seems that they can be solved
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Release Notes:
- N/A
This commit introduces a new method `range` to calculate the target
range for selection expansion based on the current selection, movement
times, and other parameters. The `expand_selection` method is refactored
to use this new `range` method, simplifying the logic for expanding a
selection and making the code more modular and reusable. The `range`
method encapsulates the logic for calculating the new selection range,
including handling linewise selection and adjustments for surrounding
newlines, making it easier to understand and maintain the selection
expansion functionality.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thorsten Ball <mrnugget@gmail.com>
For #4440, I've only added support for normal, if it's visual mode,
would we like this to delete the current selection row and enter insert
mode?
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
I'm not sure how compliant you're aiming to be with vim, but the `f`
behavior is more useful when it can search on multiple lines instead of
a single one, so I'd like to propose this change.
This change is quite frequent in vim/neovim as a plugin (e.g.
[clever-f](https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim),
[improved-ft](https://github.com/backdround/improved-ft.nvim), etc), and
in other vim emulations (e.g.
[vscode-vim](https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim)).
Activated by keystrokes g-e.
Release Notes:
- vim: Added `ge` and `gE` for go to Previous Word End.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Fixes: #7605
When repeating some cursor movements in Vim mode (e.g. `99999999 w`),
Zed tries to repeat the movement that many times, even if further
actions don't have any effect. This causes Zed to hang.
This commit makes those movements like other actions (like moving the
cursor left/right), stopping the repeat movement if a boundary of the
text is reached/the cursor can't move anymore.
Release Notes:
- Fixed [#7605](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7605).
This was originally just to fix
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354, which I did by just
returning the previous offset in `find_boundary`.. but `find_boundary`
is used in the "insert mode" / normal editor too, so returning the
previous boundary breaks existing functionality in that case.
I was considering a new `find_boundary` function just for some of the
vim motions like this, but I thought that this is straightforward enough
and future Vim functions might need similar logic too.
Release Notes:
- Fixed https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354
- Add a setting for `vertical_scroll_offset`
- Fix H/M/L in vim with scrolloff
Release Notes:
- Added a settings for `vertical_scroll_offset`
- vim: Fix H/M/L with various values of vertical_scroll_offset
---------
Co-authored-by: Vbhavsar <vbhavsar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: fdionisi <code@fdionisi.me>
This fixes#6815 by implementing `<space>` in normal mode in Vim. Turns
out that `<space>` behaves like a reverse `<backspace>` (which we
already had): it goes to the right and, if at end of line, to the next
line.
That means I had to touch `movement::right`, which is used in a few
places, but it's documentation said that it would go to the next line,
which it did *not*. So I changed the behaviour.
But I would love another pair of eyes on this, because I don't want to
break non-Vim behaviour.
Release Notes:
- Added support for `<space>` in Vim normal mode: `<space>` goes to the
right and to next line if at end of line.
([#6815](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/6815)).
This fixes `t` not being repeatable with `,` and `;` in normal mode.
Release Notes:
- Fixed `t` in Vim mode not being repeatable with `,` or `;`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
This change implements the vim
[motion](https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/doc/motion.txt)
commands to move the cursor to the top, middle and bottom of the visible
view. This feature is requested in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941.
This change takes inspiration from
[crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs).
A note on the behavior of these commands: Because
`NeovimBackedTestContext` requires compatibility with nvim, the current
implementation causes slightly non-standard behavior: it causes the
editor to scroll a few lines. The standard behavior causes no scrolling.
It is easy enough to account for the margin by adding
`VERTICAL_SCROLL_MARGIN`. However, doing so will cause test failures due
to the disparity between nvim and zed states. Perhaps
`NeovimBackedTestContext` should have a switch to be more tolerant for
such cases.
Release Notes:
- Added support for moving to top, middle and bottom of the screen in
vim mode (`H`, `M`, and `L`)
([#4941](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941)).
Use word_characters to feed completion trigger characters as well and
also recognize kebab as a potential sub-word splitter. This is fine for
non-kebab-case languages because we'd only ever attempt to split a word
with a kebab in it in language scopes which are kebab-cased
Co-Authored-By: Max Brunsfeld <max@zed.dev>
Before this change up and down were in display co-ordinates, after this
change they are in fold coordinates (which matches the vim behaviour).
To make this work without causing usabliity problems, a bunch of extra
keyboard shortcuts now work:
- vim: `z {o,c}` to open,close a fold
- vim: `z f` to fold current visual selection
- vim: `g {j,k,up,down}` to move up/down a display line
- vim: `g {0,^,$,home,end}` to get to start/end of a display line
Fixes: zed-industries/community#1562
This PR adds new config option to language config called
`word_boundaries` that controls which characters should be recognised as
word boundary for a given language. This will improve our UX for
languages such as PHP and Tailwind.
Release Notes:
- Improved completions for PHP
[#1820](https://github.com/zed-industries/community/issues/1820)
---------
Co-authored-by: Julia Risley <julia@zed.dev>
This PR adds new config option to language config called
`word_boundaries` that controls which characters should be recognised as
word boundary for a given language. This will improve our UX for
languages such as PHP and Tailwind.
Release Notes:
- Improved completions for PHP
[#1820](https://github.com/zed-industries/community/issues/1820)
---------
Co-authored-by: Julia Risley <julia@zed.dev>
