https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/30972 brought up another
case where our context is not enough to track the actual source of the
issue: we get a general top-level error without inner error.
The reason for this was `.ok_or_else(|| anyhow!("failed to read HEAD
SHA"))?; ` on the top level.
The PR finally reworks the way we use anyhow to reduce such issues (or
at least make it simpler to bubble them up later in a fix).
On top of that, uses a few more anyhow methods for better readability.
* `.ok_or_else(|| anyhow!("..."))`, `map_err` and other similar error
conversion/option reporting cases are replaced with `context` and
`with_context` calls
* in addition to that, various `anyhow!("failed to do ...")` are
stripped with `.context("Doing ...")` messages instead to remove the
parasitic `failed to` text
* `anyhow::ensure!` is used instead of `if ... { return Err(...); }`
calls
* `anyhow::bail!` is used instead of `return Err(anyhow!(...));`
Release Notes:
- N/A
This is the core change:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/26758/files#diff-044302c0d57147af17e68a0009fee3e8dcdfb4f32c27a915e70cfa80e987f765R1052
TODO:
- [x] Use AsyncFn instead of Fn() -> Future in GPUI spawn methods
- [x] Implement it in the whole app
- [x] Implement it in the debugger
- [x] Glance at the RPC crate, and see if those box future methods can
be switched over. Answer: It can't directly, as you can't make an
AsyncFn* into a trait object. There's ways around that, but they're all
more complex than just keeping the code as is.
- [ ] Fix platform specific code
Release Notes:
- N/A
Done automatically with
> ast-grep -p '$A.background_executor().spawn($B)' -r
'$A.background_spawn($B)' --update-all --globs "\!crates/gpui"
Followed by:
* `cargo fmt`
* Unexpected need to remove some trailing whitespace.
* Manually adding imports of `gpui::{AppContext as _}` which provides
`background_spawn`
* Added `AppContext as _` to existing use of `AppContext`
Release Notes:
- N/A
There's still a bit more work to do on this, but this PR is compiling
(with warnings) after eliminating the key types. When the tasks below
are complete, this will be the new narrative for GPUI:
- `Entity<T>` - This replaces `View<T>`/`Model<T>`. It represents a unit
of state, and if `T` implements `Render`, then `Entity<T>` implements
`Element`.
- `&mut App` This replaces `AppContext` and represents the app.
- `&mut Context<T>` This replaces `ModelContext` and derefs to `App`. It
is provided by the framework when updating an entity.
- `&mut Window` Broken out of `&mut WindowContext` which no longer
exists. Every method that once took `&mut WindowContext` now takes `&mut
Window, &mut App` and every method that took `&mut ViewContext<T>` now
takes `&mut Window, &mut Context<T>`
Not pictured here are the two other failed attempts. It's been quite a
month!
Tasks:
- [x] Remove `View`, `ViewContext`, `WindowContext` and thread through
`Window`
- [x] [@cole-miller @mikayla-maki] Redraw window when entities change
- [x] [@cole-miller @mikayla-maki] Get examples and Zed running
- [x] [@cole-miller @mikayla-maki] Fix Zed rendering
- [x] [@mikayla-maki] Fix todo! macros and comments
- [x] Fix a bug where the editor would not be redrawn because of view
caching
- [x] remove publicness window.notify() and replace with
`AppContext::notify`
- [x] remove `observe_new_window_models`, replace with
`observe_new_models` with an optional window
- [x] Fix a bug where the project panel would not be redrawn because of
the wrong refresh() call being used
- [x] Fix the tests
- [x] Fix warnings by eliminating `Window` params or using `_`
- [x] Fix conflicts
- [x] Simplify generic code where possible
- [x] Rename types
- [ ] Update docs
### issues post merge
- [x] Issues switching between normal and insert mode
- [x] Assistant re-rendering failure
- [x] Vim test failures
- [x] Mac build issue
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Antonio Scandurra <me@as-cii.com>
Co-authored-by: Cole Miller <cole@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Joseph <joseph@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: max <max@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sloan <michael@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla Maki <mikaylamaki@Mikaylas-MacBook-Pro.local>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla.c.maki@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joão <joao@zed.dev>
This adds the requirement for users to accept the terms of service the
first time they send a message with the Cloud provider.
Once this is out and in a nightly, we need to add the check to the
server side too, to authenticate access to the models.
Demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0edebf74-8120-4fa2-b801-bb76f04e8a17
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR provides some of the plumbing needed for a "remote" zed
instance.
The way this will work is:
* From zed on your laptop you'll be able to manage a set of dev servers,
each of which is identified by a token.
* You'll run `zed --dev-server-token XXXX` to boot a remotable dev
server.
* From the zed on your laptop you'll be able to open directories and
work on the projects on the remote server (exactly like collaboration
works today).
For now all this PR does is provide the ability for a zed instance to
sign in
using a "dev server token". The next steps will be:
* Adding support to the collaboration protocol to instruct a dev server
to "open" a directory and share it into a channel.
* Adding UI to manage these servers and tokens (manually for now)
Related #5347
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan <nathan@zed.dev>
Refactor HTTP and github release downloading into util
Lazily download / upgrade the copilot LSP from Zed
Co-authored-by: Max <max@zed.dev>
Co-Authored-By: Antonio <antonio@zed.dev>
Previously, we were achieving this by deleting the keychain item, but this can sometimes fail which leads to an infinite loop. Now, we explicitly never try the keychain when reattempting authentication after authentication fails.
Co-Authored-By: Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>
When a network connection is lost without being explicitly closed by the
other end, writes to that connection will error, but reads will just wait
indefinitely.
This allows the tests to exercise our heartbeat logic.
Using a bounded channel may have blocked the collaboration server
from making progress handling RPC traffic.
There's no need to apply backpressure to calling code within the
same process - suspending a task that is attempting to call `send` has
an even greater memory cost than just buffering a protobuf message.
We do still want a bounded channel for incoming messages, so that
we provide backpressure to noisy peers - blocking their writes as opposed
to allowing them to buffer arbitrarily many messages in our server.
Co-Authored-By: Antonio Scandurra <me@as-cii.com>
Co-Authored-By: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
We hold these locks for a short amount of time anyway, and using an
async lock could cause parallel sends to happen in an order different
than the order in which `send`/`request` was called.
Co-Authored-By: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
This will make it possible for us to render their avatars. Previously we only had the user ids. During rendering, everything needs to be available synchronously. So now, whenever collaborators are added, we perform the async I/O to fetch their user data prior to adding them to the worktree.
