Fixes:
* Types in binary unions as per [PEP
604](https://peps.python.org/pep-0604/) not highlighted;
* `except*` keyword not highlighted;
* Classes beginning with `_` not recognized as such, however `_` is a
valid first character for private classes; additionally the regex for
parsing constant/class names appeared inconsistent and incomplete so was
adjusted;
* Builtin types such as `float`, `dict`, etc not recognized as types;
* **Update:** decorators with arguments not recognized as decorators;
* **Update:** docstrings after type alias assignments not recognized as
docstrings;
* **Update:** `and/in/is/not/or/is not/not in` not capturable as
keywords;
* **Update:** decorators with "nesting" (@x.y.z) not recognized as
decorators;
Before:
After:
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Piotr Osiewicz <24362066+osiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Max <max@zed.dev>
Release Notes:
- vim: Added motions `[[`, `[]`, `]]`, `][` for navigating by section,
`[m`, `]m`, `[M`, `]M` for navigating by method, and `[*`, `]*`, `[/`,
`]/` for comments. These currently only work for languages built in to
Zed, as they are powered by new tree-sitter queries.
- vim: Added new text objects: `ic`, `ac` for inside/around classes,
`if`,`af` for functions/methods, and `g c` for comments. These currently
only work for languages built in to Zed, as they are powered by new
tree-sitter queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Max <max@zed.dev>
[PEP484](https://peps.python.org/pep-0484/) defines "Forward references"
for undefined types. This PR treats such annotations as types rather
than strings.
Release Notes:
- Added Python syntax highlighting for forward references.
Closes #12080, #18649.
Screenshot:
<img width="1499" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2644c2fc-19cf-4d2c-a992-5c56cb22deed">
Still in progress:
1. I'd like to add configuration options for selecting a Python test
runner (either pytest or unittest) so that users can explicitly choose
which runner they'd like to use for running their tests. This preference
has to be configured as unittest-style tests can also be run by pytest,
meaning we can't rely on auto-discovery to choose the desired test
runner.
2. I'd like to add venv auto-discovery similar to the feature currently
provided by the terminal using detect_venv.
3. Unit tests.
Unfortunately I'm struggling a bit with how to add settings in the
appropriate location (e.g. Python language settings). Can anyone provide
me with some pointers and/or examples on how to either add extra
settings or to re-use the existing ones?
My rust programming level is OK-ish but I'm not very familiar with the
Zed project structure and could use some help.
I'm also open for pair programming as mentioned on the website if that
helps!
Release Notes:
- Added pytest-based test discovery and runnables for Python.
- Adds a configurable option for switching between unittest and pytest
as a test runner under Python language settings. Set "TASK_RUNNER" to
"unittest" under task settings for Python if you wish to use unittest to
run Python tasks; the default is pytest.
---------
Co-authored-by: Piotr Osiewicz <24362066+osiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Release Notes:
- Differentiate between function and method calls and definitions.
`function.definition` matches the highlight for e.g. rust,
`function.call` is new.
- Likewise differentiate between class calls and class definitions.
- Better highlighting of function decorators (the `@` symbol is
punctuation, and now the decorator itself has a `function.decorator`
tag)
- Make `cls` a special variable (like `self`)
- Add `ellipsis` as a built-in constant
Note that most themes do not currently make use of the
`function.definition` tags, and none make use of the
`type.class.definition` tag. Hopefully more themes will pick this up.
*Before:*
<img width="248" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/550ccd3d-594c-413a-b543-ef9caf39eee1">
*After:*
<img width="245" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47aa43b1-006b-4f9f-9029-510880f390ea">
Closes#13998
/cc @notpeter would you mind giving this branch a go to see if this is
pleasant to use? This impl is not quite what VSC has, but I think it
feels okay?
In this PR, the sequence goes as follows:
1st keypress: "|"
2nd keypress: ""|
3rd keypress: """|"""
Release Notes:
- Improved handling of triple-quote strings in Python.
This tackles an issue with us exposing unnecessary env variables in
environment which are not actually needed for tasks themselves (and may
have little utility), yet come into the way of ssh remoting.
/cc @ConradIrwin
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#18722
- Replace the `@escape` capture name with `@string.escape` for escape
sequences in Go, Python, Regex, Racket, Ruby, and Scheme.
- Rust
- Add syntax highlighting for escape sequences. Close#18722
- Fix the issue where `@punctuation.delimiter` is being overwritten by
`@operator`.
- Add the period (".") to `@punctuation.delimiter`.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Add runnable tasks for Python, starting with `unittest` from the
standard library. Both `TestCase`s (classes meant to be a unit of
testing) and individual test functions in a `TestCase` will have
runnable icons. For completeness, I also included a task that will run
`unittest` on the current file.
The implementation follows the `unittest` CLI. The unittest module can
be used from the command line to run tests from modules, classes or even
individual test methods:
```
python -m unittest test_module.TestClass
python -m unittest test_module.TestClass.test_method
```
```python
import unittest
class TestStringMethods(unittest.TestCase):
def test_upper(self):
self.assertEqual('foo'.upper(), 'FOO')
def test_isupper(self):
self.assertTrue('FOO'.isupper())
self.assertFalse('Foo'.isupper())
def test_split(self):
s = 'hello world'
self.assertEqual(s.split(), ['hello', 'world'])
# check that s.split fails when the separator is not a string
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
s.split(2)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
```
From the snippet provided by `unittest` docs, a user may want to run
test_split independently of the other test functions in the test case.
Hence, I decided to make each test function runnable despite `TestCase`s
being the unit of testing.
## Example of running a `TestCase`
<img width="600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/assets/16619392/7be38b71-9d51-4b44-9840-f819502d600a">
## Example of running a test function in a `TestCase`
<img width="600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/assets/16619392/f0b6274c-4fa7-424e-a0f5-1dc723842046">
`unittest` will also run the `setUp` and `tearDown` fixtures.
Eventually, I want to add the more commonly used `pytest` runnables
(perhaps as an extension instead).
Release Notes:
- Added runnable tasks for Python `unittest`.
([#12080](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/12080)).
- Moves languages module from `zed` into a separate crate. That way we
have less of a long pole at the end of compilation.
- Removes moot dependencies on editor/picker. This is totally harmless
and might help in the future if we decide to decouple picker from
editor.
Before:
```
Number of crates that depend on 'picker' but not on 'editor': 1
Total number of crates that depend on 'picker': 13
Total number of crates that depend on 'editor': 30
```
After:
```
Number of crates that depend on 'picker' but not on 'editor': 5
Total number of crates that depend on 'picker': 12
Total number of crates that depend on 'editor': 26
```
The more crates depend on just picker but not editor, the better in that
case.
Release Notes:
- N/A
